What a buyer sees
MENTA (REGENERATION) LIMITED
Development of building projects · London · 09739506
2staff · FY2023
11years trading
63oldest owner on file
£824kcash at bank
Your turnover is on public record
filed£14Mfor the year to 2023
Unusual at this size, and it works in your favour: a buyer is reading your number rather than guessing at one.
What your filings show moving
Staff2
20220 → 22023
Cash at bank£824k
2022£0k → £824k2023
How you sit in your trade
slowest tenth typical fastest tenth youSales per employee£7,182,800above almost all
£14,093£106,917£1,225,073
Debtor daysdays171in the top quarter
1239184
Creditor daysdays20
927189
Stock daysdaysnot on your filings
10137909
Each spread is companies in the same trade and size that did publish a turnover. Creditor days are shown but not marked: neither end of that one is plainly good.
What a buyer would ask 3
- The newest accounts on file are 41 months oldAnyone looking at the company today is reading a year that has already ended. Whatever has improved since is invisible.
- Debtor days run high for your tradeYours is 171 against 39 for the middle of 259 comparable companies. That gap is working capital a buyer has to fund on day one, and it comes off the price.
- No website on file against the companyThe first thing anyone does with a company number is look for the business behind it. Finding nothing is its own answer.
What a buyer would like 1
- Sales per employee better than three quarters of your tradeYours is 7,182,800 against 106,917 for the middle of 218 comparable companies.
What the register says
Owners
- 63since 2016
- 57since 2016
Directors
No current directors loaded.
| Year to | Turnover | Staff | Cash |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-31 | £14M | 2 | £824k |
| 2022-06-30 | not filed | 0 | £0k |
A rough bracket, and why it is only that
0.2–0.45× sales£2.9M£6.5M
The turnover range is fitted on UK companies that did file one. The multiple is a published sector average from Dutch mid-market deals, not from your own numbers and not from your own market. Treat this as the opening bracket of a conversation, not a valuation.