What a buyer sees
JOLANKA (UK) LIMITED
Wholesale of clothing and footwear · Cheshire · 03834047
13staff · FY2025
27years trading
55oldest owner on file
£1.9Mcash at bank
Your turnover is on public record
filed£16Mfor the year to 2025
Unusual at this size, and it works in your favour: a buyer is reading your number rather than guessing at one.
What your filings show moving
Staff13
202114 → 132025
Cash at bank£1.9M
2021£983k → £1.9M2025
How you sit in your trade
slowest tenth typical fastest tenth youSales per employee£1,244,700in the top quarter
£91,097£489,234£1,487,511
Debtor daysdays51in the middle half
2051105
Creditor daysdays3
163782
Stock daysdays27in the bottom quarter
1473151
Each spread is companies in the same trade and size that did publish a turnover. Creditor days are shown but not marked: neither end of that one is plainly good.
What a buyer would ask 1
- No website on file against the companyThe first thing anyone does with a company number is look for the business behind it. Finding nothing is its own answer.
What a buyer would like 3
- 27 years of trading on fileLongevity is the cheapest evidence there is that the business is not one contract.
- Sales per employee better than three quarters of your tradeYours is 1,244,700 against 489,234 for the middle of 52 comparable companies.
- Stock days better than three quarters of your tradeYours is 27 against 73 for the middle of 46 comparable companies.
What the register says
Owners
- 55since 2016
- 47since 2025
Directors
- 78since 1999
- 55since 2000
- 47since 2021
| Year to | Filed | Turnover | Staff | Cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-31 | 2026-07-30 | £16M | 13 | £1.9M |
| 2023-10-31 | — | £22M | 13 | £1.5M |
| 2022-10-31 | — | £26M | 14 | £1.4M |
| 2021-10-31 | — | £21M | 14 | £983k |
A rough bracket, and why it is only that
0.35–0.55× sales£5.7M£8.9M
The turnover range is fitted on UK companies that did file one. The multiple is a published sector average from Dutch mid-market deals, not from your own numbers and not from your own market. Treat this as the opening bracket of a conversation, not a valuation.