What a buyer sees
I-COVER (SCREENING) LIMITED
Other service activities n.e.c. · London · 06643359
6staff · FY2025
18years trading
46oldest owner on file
£588kcash at bank
Your turnover is on public record
filed£4.4Mfor the year to 2025
Unusual at this size, and it works in your favour: a buyer is reading your number rather than guessing at one.
What your filings show moving
Staff6
20216 → 62025
Cash at bank£588k
2021£678k → £588k2025
How you sit in your trade
slowest tenth typical fastest tenth youSales per employee£725,417above almost all
£10,500£42,667£293,310
Debtor daysdays115in the top quarter
1141156
Creditor daysdays0
1033152
Stock daysdaysnot on your filings
823163
Each spread is companies in the same trade and size that did publish a turnover. Creditor days are shown but not marked: neither end of that one is plainly good.
What a buyer would ask 2
- Debtor days run high for your tradeYours is 115 against 40 for the middle of 262 comparable companies. That gap is working capital a buyer has to fund on day one, and it comes off the price.
- No website on file against the companyThe first thing anyone does with a company number is look for the business behind it. Finding nothing is its own answer.
What a buyer would like 2
- Headcount grew from 5 to 6Growth a buyer can verify without asking you for anything.
- Sales per employee better than three quarters of your tradeYours is 725,417 against 42,667 for the middle of 325 comparable companies.
What the register says
Owners
- 46since 2016
Directors
- 46since 2008
- 56since 2023
| Year to | Filed | Turnover | Staff | Cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-31 | 2026-09-15 | £4.4M | 6 | £588k |
| 2023-12-31 | — | £2.2M | 5 | £444k |
| 2022-12-31 | — | £2.4M | 5 | £1.2M |
| 2021-12-31 | — | £2.5M | 6 | £678k |
A rough bracket, and why it is only that
0.4–0.9× sales£1.7M£3.9M
The turnover range is fitted on UK companies that did file one. The multiple is a published sector average from Dutch mid-market deals, not from your own numbers and not from your own market. Treat this as the opening bracket of a conversation, not a valuation.